Do systems of intellectual property frustrate or facilitate the inventive activities and entrepreneurial processes central to economic growth? This is a central question facing societies around the world, but there is a dearth of data-driven, peer-refereed scholarship that speaks to it.

The goal of Working Group on Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Prosperity (Hoover IP²) is to produce that body of impactful, peer-refereed scholarship. We do so by subjecting academic papers in progress to criticism and discussion by other academics, by government officials, and by representatives from the private sector.

Our goal, in short, is to bring data to a debate that has been long on rhetoric, but short on facts, dispassionately gathered and analyzed.

Does the US patent system as currently constituted hold up or push forward the commercialization of technological innovations?

Hoover IP²’s goals are to:

  • Build network of scholars, from various disciplines, who are working on IP issues
  • Analyze the implications that may be drawn from those research results
  • Publish the resulting scholarship in peer-reviewed venues
  • Disseminate that scholarship to the larger public

The US patent system is a solution to a delicate balancing act where the complete absence of intellectual property rights or the overly broad specification of those rights can thwart innovation.

Inventors require the means to earn a return on the years spent perfecting an invention. Conversely, patents extending in perpetuity that require licensing and royalty payments would dissuade legitimate use and encourage excessive imitation. Further, a patent system providing property rights to the original patent holder for all future inventions that built on the original idea is non-optimal.

Such an unbalanced system would discourage innovation.

The US patent system addresses the need for balance by:

  • Providing a fixed-term property right for a specific and novel invention
  • Requiring, in turn, that the design features of the invention be widely disseminated so that they enter the public domain once the term of the patent expires
  • Permitting a patentee to exchange or license the patented invention

The Hoover Institution Working Group on Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Prosperity (Hoover IP²) is reviewing the premises of the US patent system and addressing questions of scope, specification, duration, and economic impact of that system.

Underlying the US patent system is a fundamental principle of economics first articulated by Adam Smith more than two centuries ago and empirically demonstrated countless times since:

  • Poperty rights, appropriately defined, give individuals and firms incentrives to trade
  • Trade provides incentives to specialize
  • Specialization is essential for technological innovation

Academic research on the patent system tends to be insular and is specific to certain fields, most particularly law. Support from the Hoover IP² project aims both to broaden the number of researchers in the patent literature and to improve the quality of the causal inferences they draw.

Hoover Institution and Stanford University thank the following donors for their support of Hoover IP².

Qualcomm® Technologies, Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
InterDigital, Inc.
Cravath, Swain & Moore LLP
Rod Cooper
Jonathan Barnett
Ron Katznelson
Joshua B. Wright