Does the US patent system as currently constituted hold up
or push forward the commercialization of technological innovations?
Does the US patent system frustrate or facilitate
the inventive activities and entrepreneurial processes central to economic growth?
- PROJECT SUMMARY
- RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY
Inventors require the means to earn a return on the years spent perfecting an invention. Conversely, patents extending in perpetuity that require licensing and royalty payments would dissuade legitimate use and encourage excessive imitation. Further, a patent system providing property rights to the original patent holder for all future inventions that built on the original idea is non-optimal.
Such an unbalanced system would discourage innovation.
The US patent system addresses the need for balance by:
- Providing a fixed-term property right for a specific and novel invention
- Requiring, in turn, that the design features of the invention be widely disseminated so that they enter the public domain once the term of the patent expires
- Permitting a patentee to exchange or license the patented invention
The Hoover Institution Working Group on Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Prosperity (Hoover IP²) is reviewing the premises of the US patent system and addressing questions of scope, specification, duration, and economic impact of that system.
Hoover IP²’s goals are to:
- Build a dense network of scholars, from a variety of academic disciplines, who are engaged in research on the US patent system
- Analyze the implications that may be drawn from those research results
- Publish the resulting scholarship in peer-reviewed venues
- Disseminate that scholarship to the larger public
- Poperty rights, appropriately defined, give individuals and firms incentrives to trade
- Trade provides incentives to specialize
- Specialization is essential for technological innovation
Academic research on the patent system tends to be insular and is specific to certain fields, most particularly law. Support from the Hoover IP² project aims both to broaden the number of researchers in the patent literature and to improve the quality of the causal inferences they draw.